lt;meta charset=quot;utf-8quot;gt; vs lt;meta http-equiv=quot;Content-Typequot;gt;(lt;元字符集=“utf-8gt;vslt;meta http-equiv=“Content-Typegt;)
问题描述
In order to define charset for HTML5 Doctype, which notation should I use?
Short:
<meta charset="utf-8" />
Long:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
In HTML5, they are equivalent. Use the shorter one, as it is easier to remember and type. Browser support is fine since it was designed for backwards compatibility.
这篇关于<元字符集=“utf-8">vs<meta http-equiv=“Content-Type">的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:<元字符集=“utf-8">vs<meta http-equiv=“Content-Type">


基础教程推荐
- fetch 是否支持原生多文件上传? 2022-01-01
- 检查 HTML5 拖放文件类型 2022-01-01
- 在 contenteditable 中精确拖放 2022-01-01
- Bokeh Div文本对齐 2022-01-01
- Bootstrap 模态出现在背景下 2022-01-01
- npm start 错误与 create-react-app 2022-01-01
- 如何添加到目前为止的天数? 2022-01-01
- Fabric JS绘制具有活动形状的多边形 2022-01-01
- 即使用户允许,Gmail 也会隐藏外部电子邮件图片 2022-01-01
- 原生拖动事件后如何获取 mouseup 事件? 2022-01-01