Java BlockingQueue take() vs poll()(Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll())
问题描述
When consuming values from a Queue in an infinite loop -- what would be more efficient:
1) Blocking on the Queue until a value is available via take()
while (value = queue.take()) { doSomething(value); }
2) Sleeping for n milliseconds and checking if an item is available
while (true) {
if ((value = queue.poll()) != null) { doSomething(value); }
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
Blocking is likely more efficient. In the background, the thread that initially calls take() goes to sleep if there is no element available, letting other threads do whatever they need to do. The methods that add elements to the Queue will then wake up waiting threads when an element is added, so minimal time is spent checking the queue over and over again for whether an element is available.
这篇关于Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()
基础教程推荐
- REST Web 服务返回 415 - 不支持的媒体类型 2022-01-01
- 修改 void 函数的输入参数,然后读取 2022-01-01
- 问题http://apache.org/xml/features/xinclude测试日志4j 2 2022-01-01
- RabbitMQ:消息保持“未确认"; 2022-01-01
- 无法复制:“比较方法违反了它的一般约定!" 2022-01-01
- Spring AOP错误无法懒惰地为此建议构建thisJoinPoin 2022-09-13
- 存储 20 位数字的数据类型 2022-01-01
- 如何对 Java Hashmap 中的值求和 2022-01-01
- 使用堆栈算法进行括号/括号匹配 2022-01-01
- Struts2 URL 无法访问 2022-01-01
