AutoResetEvent, ManualResetEvent vs Monitor(AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器)
问题描述
Lets say I have to orchestrate a synchronization algorithm in .Net 3.5 SP1 and any of the synchronization primitives listed in the title fit perfectly for the task.
From a performance perspective, is any single one of those more performant than the others?
I ask this because I have been coding for a while now, but without proper knowledge on the subject.
If you can, go with Monitor. It's similar to a CRITICAL_SECTION. AutoResetEvent/ManualResetEvent might have slightly more overhead, since these can be shared by different processes, whereas a Monitor belongs to a single process.
这篇关于AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器
基础教程推荐
- Mono https webrequest 失败并显示“身份验证或解密失败" 2022-01-01
- 获取C#保存对话框的文件路径 2022-01-01
- SonarQube C# 分析失败“不是指针的有效行偏移" 2022-01-01
- C# 9 新特性——record的相关总结 2023-04-03
- 在 VB6 或经典 ASP 中使用 .NET 2022-01-01
- 将数据集转换为列表 2022-01-01
- 从 C# 控制相机设备 2022-01-01
- 更新 Visual Studio 中的 DataSet 结构以匹配新的 SQL 数据库结构 2022-01-01
- 如果条件可以为空 2022-01-01
- 重新排序 WPF TabControl 中的选项卡 2022-01-01
