Alternative to boost::shared_ptr in an embedded environment(在嵌入式环境中替代 boost::shared_ptr)
问题描述
I'm using C++ in an embedded linux environment which has GCC version 2.95.
I just can't extract boost::shared_ptr files with bcp, it is just too heavy.
What I'd like would be a simple smart pointer implementation of boost::shared_ptr but without all boost overheads (if it is possible...).
I could come up with my own version reading boost source but I fear missing one or more points, it seems easy to make a faulty smart pointer and I can't afford to have a buggy implementation.
So, does a "simple" implementation or implementation example of boost::shared_ptr (or any reference counting equivalent smart pointer) exists that I could use or that I could take as an inspiration?
if you don't need mixing shared and weak ptr,and don't need coustom deletors, you can just use the quick and dirty my_shared_ptr:
template<class T>
class my_shared_ptr
{
template<class U>
friend class my_shared_ptr;
public:
my_shared_ptr() :p(), c() {}
explicit my_shared_ptr(T* s) :p(s), c(new unsigned(1)) {}
my_shared_ptr(const my_shared_ptr& s) :p(s.p), c(s.c) { if(c) ++*c; }
my_shared_ptr& operator=(const my_shared_ptr& s)
{ if(this!=&s) { clear(); p=s.p; c=s.c; if(c) ++*c; } return *this; }
template<class U>
my_shared_ptr(const my_shared_ptr<U>& s) :p(s.p), c(s.c) { if(c) ++*c; }
~my_shared_ptr() { clear(); }
void clear()
{
if(c)
{
if(*c==1) delete p;
if(!--*c) delete c;
}
c=0; p=0;
}
T* get() const { return (c)? p: 0; }
T* operator->() const { return get(); }
T& operator*() const { return *get(); }
private:
T* p;
unsigned* c;
}
For anyone interested in make_my_shared<X>, it can be trivially implemented as
template<class T, class... U>
auto make_my_shared(U&&... u)
{
return my_shared_ptr<T>(new T{std::forward<U>(u)...});
}
to be called as
auto pt = make_my_shared<T>( ... );
这篇关于在嵌入式环境中替代 boost::shared_ptr的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:在嵌入式环境中替代 boost::shared_ptr
基础教程推荐
- 非静态 const 成员,不能使用默认赋值运算符 2022-10-09
- CString 到 char* 2021-01-01
- GDB 显示调用堆栈上函数地址的当前编译二进制文 2022-09-05
- 我应该对 C++ 中的成员变量和函数参数使用相同的名称吗? 2021-01-01
- 为什么 RegOpenKeyEx() 在 Vista 64 位上返回错误代码 2021-01-01
- 如果我为无符号变量分配负值会发生什么? 2022-01-01
- 为什么 typeid.name() 使用 GCC 返回奇怪的字符以及如 2022-09-16
- 通过引用传递 C++ 迭代器有什么问题? 2022-01-01
- 为什么派生模板类不能访问基模板类的标识符? 2021-01-01
- 初始化列表*参数*评估顺序 2021-01-01
