C++ const keyword - use liberally?(C++ const 关键字 - 随意使用?)
问题描述
In the following C++ functions:
void MyFunction(int age, House &purchased_house)
{
...
}
void MyFunction(const int age, House &purchased_house)
{
...
}
Which is better?
In both, 'age' is passed by value. I am wondering if the 'const' keyword is necessary: It seems redundant to me, but also helpful (as an extra indication the variable will not be changing).
Does anyone have any opinion as to which (if any) of the above are better?
This, IMHO, is overusing. When you say 'const int age,...' what you actually say is "you can't change even the local copy inside your function". What you do is actually make the programmer code less readable by forcing him to use another local copy when he wants to change age/pass it by non-const reference.
Any programmer should be familiar with the difference between pass by reference and pass by value just as any programmer should understand 'const'.
这篇关于C++ const 关键字 - 随意使用?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:C++ const 关键字 - 随意使用?


基础教程推荐
- 我应该对 C++ 中的成员变量和函数参数使用相同的名称吗? 2021-01-01
- 非静态 const 成员,不能使用默认赋值运算符 2022-10-09
- GDB 显示调用堆栈上函数地址的当前编译二进制文 2022-09-05
- 初始化列表*参数*评估顺序 2021-01-01
- 为什么 typeid.name() 使用 GCC 返回奇怪的字符以及如 2022-09-16
- 为什么 RegOpenKeyEx() 在 Vista 64 位上返回错误代码 2021-01-01
- 通过引用传递 C++ 迭代器有什么问题? 2022-01-01
- 为什么派生模板类不能访问基模板类的标识符? 2021-01-01
- CString 到 char* 2021-01-01
- 如果我为无符号变量分配负值会发生什么? 2022-01-01