Math precision requirements of C and C++ standard(C 和 C++ 标准的数学精度要求)
问题描述
Do the C and C++ standards require the math operations in math.h on floating points (i.e. sqrt, exp, log, sin, ...) to return numerically best solution?
For a given (exact and valid) input there can obviously in general not be an exact floating point output from these functions. But is the output required to be the representable value nearest to the mathematically exact one?
If not, are there any requirements on precision whatsoever (possibly platform-specific / in other standards ?), so that I am able to make worst-case estimates of calculation errors in my code? What are typical limits on numerical errors of modern implementations?
No, and for good reason. In general, you'd need an infinite precision (and infinite time) to determine the exact mathematical result. Now most of the times you need only a few extra iterations to determine sufficient bits for rounding, but this number of extra bits depend on the exact result (simply put: when the result is close to .5 ULP). Even determining the extra number of iterations required is highly non-trivial. As a result, requiring exact results is far, far slower than a pragmatic approach.
这篇关于C 和 C++ 标准的数学精度要求的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:C 和 C++ 标准的数学精度要求
基础教程推荐
- 为什么 RegOpenKeyEx() 在 Vista 64 位上返回错误代码 2021-01-01
- 我应该对 C++ 中的成员变量和函数参数使用相同的名称吗? 2021-01-01
- 为什么 typeid.name() 使用 GCC 返回奇怪的字符以及如 2022-09-16
- CString 到 char* 2021-01-01
- GDB 显示调用堆栈上函数地址的当前编译二进制文 2022-09-05
- 通过引用传递 C++ 迭代器有什么问题? 2022-01-01
- 初始化列表*参数*评估顺序 2021-01-01
- 非静态 const 成员,不能使用默认赋值运算符 2022-10-09
- 如果我为无符号变量分配负值会发生什么? 2022-01-01
- 为什么派生模板类不能访问基模板类的标识符? 2021-01-01
