Can you have an INNER JOIN without the ON keyword?(你能有一个没有 ON 关键字的 INNER JOIN 吗?)
问题描述
在调试一些 Oracle 代码时,我遇到了这个查询:
While debugging into some Oracle code, I came across this query:
SELECT TPM_TASK.TASKID FROM TPM_GROUP
INNER JOIN TPM_USERGROUPS ON TPM_GROUP.GROUPID = TPM_USERGROUPS.GROUPID
INNER JOIN TPM_TASK
INNER JOIN TPM_GROUPTASKS ON TPM_TASK.TASKID = TPM_GROUPTASKS.TASKID
INNER JOIN TPM_PROJECTVERSION ON TPM_TASK.PROJECTID = TPM_PROJECTVERSION.PROJECTID AND TPM_TASK.VERSIONID = TPM_PROJECTVERSION.VERSIONID
INNER JOIN TPM_TASKSTAGE ON TPM_TASK.STAGEID = TPM_TASKSTAGE.STAGEID
INNER JOIN TPM_PROJECTSTAGE ON TPM_PROJECTVERSION.STAGEID = TPM_PROJECTSTAGE.STAGEID
ON TPM_GROUP.GROUPID = TPM_GROUPTASKS.GROUPID
我被这条线搞糊涂了:
INNER JOIN TPM_TASK
我以前从未见过没有 ON 子句的 JOIN.同样令人困惑的是这条线:
I haven't seen a JOIN without an ON clause before. Also confusing is the line:
ON TPM_GROUP.GROUPID = TPM_GROUPTASKS.GROUPID
这似乎是一个随机的 ON 子句,没有任何匹配的 JOIN.查询运行没有任何错误,并返回一堆数据,很明显语法是完全有效的.有人能解释一下这里到底发生了什么吗?
This seems like a random ON clause without any matching JOIN. The query runs without any errors, and returns a bunch of data, so obvious the syntax is perfectly valid. Can someone shed some light on exactly what's going on here?
推荐答案
Small Universe... 昨天我遇到了一个生成这种语法的工具,很困惑.
Small universe... I ran across a tool generating this syntax yesterday and was rather flummoxed.
显然,
FROM a
INNER JOIN b
INNER JOIN c ON (b.id = c.id)
ON (a.id = c.id)
相当于嵌套子查询
FROM a
INNER JOIN (SELECT <<list of columns>>
FROM b
INNER JOIN c ON (b.id=c.id)) c
ON (a.id = c.id)
这篇关于你能有一个没有 ON 关键字的 INNER JOIN 吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:你能有一个没有 ON 关键字的 INNER JOIN 吗?
基础教程推荐
- 什么是 orradiag_<user>文件夹? 2022-01-01
- 如何根据该 XML 中的值更新 SQL 中的 XML 2021-01-01
- mysql选择动态行值作为列名,另一列作为值 2021-01-01
- 如何在 SQL 中将 Float 转换为 Varchar 2021-01-01
- MySQL 中的类型:BigInt(20) 与 Int(20) 2021-01-01
- oracle区分大小写的原因? 2021-01-01
- 表 './mysql/proc' 被标记为崩溃,应该修复 2022-01-01
- 在多列上分布任意行 2021-01-01
- 在 MySQL 中:如何将表名作为存储过程和/或函数参数传递? 2021-01-01
- 二进制文件到 SQL 数据库 Apache Camel 2021-01-01
